CloudApper vs. QuickBase: A Low-Code Comparison

No code and low code applications have been increasing in popularity in recent years. Rightly so, as companies appreciate flexibility. With several noteworthy events taking place in recent years, the ability to solve problems efficiently is crucial.

Low code and no code systems provide companies with the ability to create applications. These applications are used to solve business-specific challenges or digitize processes, while also providing a centralized platform for employees to work on, collaborate with other employees, and streamline workflows. Another benefit of low code and no code development platforms is the freedom it provides. Employees do not have to spend hours attempting to communicate their vision to a developer. The reliance on IT departments and developers is reduced as the application is simpler to navigate. As employees realize that they do not require any expertise or former experience in coding to create applications, these systems are continuing to increase in demand.

With an understanding of why low code and no-code platforms are gaining traction among businesses, now would be a good time to look into two of these systems: CloudApper, and Quickbase. We will conduct a comparison and see which platform would be better suited for your company.

CloudApper

CloudApper is a no-code mobile enterprise platform. While the focus may be on mobile applications, CloudApper enables employees to create applications without needing to write a single line of code. The simple drag and drop system allows anybody to develop an application with the modules provided. These applications can then be operated on your computer or mobile devices. All applications are also operable on IOS and Android. CloudApper also provides pre-built applications that address the processes conducted by companies, such as a customer relationship management application or a computer-aided facility management application.

Quickbase

Quickbase is a low-code database system. The platform was created for people with minimal technical knowledge to be able to develop their applications. Like many low code applications, Quickbase aims to empower people to develop applications to solve their unique problems. It is important to note that, Quickbase also provides several pre-built systems for common business processes, such as customer relationship management.

Key Considerations

With an understanding of both platforms, let’s compare the two, based on key considerations, to select the most suitable system for your app development needs.

Usability

Ease of use when selecting and using a low code or no-code platform is crucial. These platforms were created to provide beginners with the opportunity to make applications, and if the platform is difficult to use, then it defeats the purpose of selecting it in the first place. 

CloudApper uses a drag and drops method for people to create applications. Quickbase also uses a visual builder to assist employees in developing applications.

Cost

Whether you are a small, medium, or large enterprise, pricing should always be taken into consideration. Building an application on your own, rather than with the assistance of programmers and coders, will be more cost-effective. However, selecting an expensive no-code platform is still wasteful.

CloudApper uses a subscription-based payment plant. The plan is $10 per user per month and allows customers access to the platform, along with all the prebuilt applications. CloudApper also provides a free trial period.

Quickbase has three payment options classified as a team, business, and enterprise, and customers can also try out a free trial period.

Mobile Operability

Mobility and flexibility are becoming increasingly more important within the business sector. The ability to enable employees to work remotely while maintaining access to the tools that help them conduct their work is crucial. The platform chosen should allow employees to use the system without compromises on the features provided. 

CloudApper champions itself as a platform that encourages mobile operability. All of the applications are operable on a mobile device, such as a tablet or smartphone. Quickbase also provides mobile operability functions for employees who want to work while on the move.

Application Templates

Having the ability to create your application from scratch should be the focus. However, sometimes your company may need to make minor changes to applications already used within businesses. Having access to premade templates can be a convenience and should be considered. Both CloudApper and Quickbase provide several pre-built applications and templates for customers to use or customize to better suit their needs.

Summary and Conclusion

Both CloudApper and Quickbase provide many benefits as a no-code and low-code development platform. Both platforms implement a simple system for creating applications and provide several useful features. With a lower subscription fee, CloudApper may be more suitable for several companies, including startups and small and medium enterprises. With a trial period available, now would be the best time for customers to try out the system for their application building needs.